[Geany-Users] The future of the GeanyPrj plugin

[Frank Lanitz]

Am 31.01.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
> On 30/01/15 20:49, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> On 31 January 2015 at 02:18, Jiří Techet <techet at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> me again :-). With other Geany developers we have been discussing the future
>>> of the GeanyPrj plugin. The problem is the original developer behind it has
>>> abandoned the project so it is unmaintained now. There are several things we
>>> could do:
>>>
>>> 1. Nothing - i.e. keep it in the plugins repository unmaintained.
>>>
>>> 2. Somebody volunteers to maintain it (anyone?).
>>>
>>> 3. The plugin will be removed from the geany-plugins repository.
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss the option (3) - while I haven't used the plugin
>>> myself much, I think the main reason people were using it was you could see
>>> multiple projects in the sidebar (and have them indexed). This is however
>>> possible with my ProjectOrganizer plugin now (see the announcement) so the
>>> question is whether there is any other use for the plugin. Otherwise I
>>> believe ProjectOrganizer offers many more features and displays the project
>>> files better so at least from my point of view (which may be biased), I
>>> think ProjectOrganizer is more or less a superset of GeanyPrj. (One
>>> exception is that with ProjectOrganizer you have to create projects
>>> explicitly while with GeanyPrj there's just kind of implicit project
>>> specification by pointing it to the directory where you keep projects).
>>>
>>> So my preferred choice is (3) but if someone still finds the plugin useful
>>> and uses it, we can keep the plugin in the repository.
>>
>> The general principle that seems to have been established in the past
>> is that plugins should remain until they break, or some major problem
>> is found with them and nobody wants to fix it.
> 
> True in general, though in this particular case I would vote for
> removing geanyprj because
> a) as Jiří said, ProjectOrganizer have mostly the same features and more
> b) having one less project plugin for Geany would reduce users'
> confusion and so also ease support of those
> 
> My vote: option 3

+1

(for the same reasons.)

Cheers,
Frank


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 299 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150131/64c67cd2/attachment.sig>