[Geany] Feature request: Better suggestions

Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger at xxxxx
Sun Jul 5 15:15:15 UTC 2009


On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:17:20 -0400, John wrote:

>2009/7/4 Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de>:
>> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:07:42 +0200, Filip wrote:
>>
>>>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=982384&group_id=2439&atid=102439
>>>
>>>It seems, we are hardly the first people to notice this, but
>>>strangely the request was rejected. Any idea what can be done next?
>>
>> What Neil said: someone needs to implement it.
>>
>> But don't give up, it might happen.
>
>My impression is that Neil is fairly reasonable about accepting
>patches from other people (for example, anyone reading this list who
>has enough skill, time, and desire to write them).  If a patch doesn't
>break any existing API or behavior, doesn't negatively impact
>performance/resource usage, and is clean and understandable to Neil,
>there is a good chance he will put it into the next release.

I never intended to say anything else. Full ACK.


Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090705/915d30c2/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Users mailing list