[Geany] is geany_run_script.sh necessary?

[Enrico Tröger]

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:17:50 -0700, Steve <steve at trinidadgraphics.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:30:09 +0100
> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > > > I'd like to ask if there's a possibility to pass
> > > > > compilation/build/execute commands directly to the shell and
> > > > > not via geany_run_script.sh file.
> > > >
> > > > compile and execute commands are always used directly, only the
> > > > run command is using a shell script as a wrapper to add a "Press
> > > > return to continue" break otherwise the opened terminal would
> > > > close immediately. Additionally, with this script the program's
> > > > exit code can be displayed as well as output non-expected
> > > > output. Why do you want to skip it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Enrico
> > > 
> 
> The reason I wish there was an alternative to ./geany_run_script.sh is
> that it is prone to permissions problems in fuse-mounted remote
> directories. A command like "php -f /mountpoint/index.php" will run
> directly, but fails when wrapped in geany_run_script.sh unless the
> local and remote user are identical, which is usually not the case.
geany_run_script.sh is chmod'ed to 0700 so only the owner is allowed to
execute it. Should we change it to something like 0755?

Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.key
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071204/69438d98/attachment.pgp>