[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Ctags sync rebased (#2666)

Jiří Techet notifications at xxxxx
Mon Nov 30 18:05:22 UTC 2020


> Is there any use of that field apart for testing our mappings? Anyhow, we should not depend on this field, but we sure can add any one we like for our own purposes, we just cannot really depend on that field being present.

No, there should be no need for it apart from the unit tests and we shouldn't add them e.g. when generating tag files (which I'm afraid we won't be able to drop completely until ctags has all the parsers we have - and there are several of them in the infamous c.c parser).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2666#issuecomment-735948790
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20201130/8a10e7bc/attachment.htm>


More information about the Github-comments mailing list