[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Ctags sync rebased (#2666)

[Colomban Wendling]

> 2\. We store our own information to the tags like TMTagType which are useful e.g. for unit tests and we should also be able to do this for the ctags tag format - I think we could introduce our own extension fields for this.

Is there any use of that field apart for testing our mappings?  Anyhow, we should not *depend* on this field, but we sure can add any one we like for our own purposes, we just cannot really depend on that field being present.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2666#issuecomment-735939621
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20201130/b66e27b4/attachment.htm>