[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Ctags sync rebased (#2666)

[Jiří Techet]

> So I'm all for @techee's idea of putting the binary format to soft retirement, but indeed now might be a good time to sit down and think on possible issues it should tackle.

Agreed - two things that come in my mind:
1. We first need to synchronize kind letters with ctags so we interpret kinds from ctags correctly
2. We store our own information to the tags like TMTagType which are useful e.g. for unit tests and we should also be able to do this for the ctags tag format - I think we could introduce our own extension fields for this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2666#issuecomment-735732846
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20201130/018a7a11/attachment.htm>