[Github-comments] [geany/geany] WIP: Fix reST and Asciidoc parser scope (#2019)

[Colomban Wendling]

> Hence my question, why are you doing something different, why not just put the original back since its in upstream?
>
>Isn't the purpose of this whole exercise to sync with upstream?

It is, but I'm not sure upstream itself shouldn't be changed.  The most important reason why this is a problem is that with this behavior the parser output is semantically different from other parsers -- not to mention that it's then harder to distinguish children of identically-named sections.

But yeah, the PR here is just one solution, and we can and probably should use upstream's, changed or not. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2019#issuecomment-448207766
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20181218/e6aa45b7/attachment.html>