[Github-comments] [geany] Rewrite scope completion 3 (#862)

[Jiří Techet]

> OK. I guess having const, volatile and alike removed would be good too, but that should probably be rather parsed as var type attributes by the parser itself… but well.

I have a (maybe naive) idea about a more or less complete sync of our ctags with universal-ctags. Then we should start thinking about what extra tagEntryInfo entries we need to port to universal-ctags. To make the extra tag entries acceptable for universal-ctags, they should be as generic as possible. So for instance IMO var_type makes sense as an additional entry in the tags file of universal-ctags but we shouldn't introduce some entries too specific to our use of ctags that wouldn't make sense for anything else than Geany. If we need something too TM-specific, we should adjust the TMTag based on our needs inside TM and not ctags.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/862#issuecomment-175089970
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160126/7eb32385/attachment.html>