[Github-comments] [geany] Gtkdoc hdr (#890)

Colomban Wendling notifications at xxxxx
Fri Feb 19 16:33:43 UTC 2016


> @@ -70,3 +70,16 @@ AC_DEFUN([GEANY_CHECK_DOCUTILS_PDF],
>  	AM_CONDITIONAL([WITH_RST2PDF], [test "x$geany_enable_pdf_docs" != "xno"])
>  	GEANY_STATUS_ADD([Build PDF documentation], [$geany_enable_pdf_docs])
>  ])
> +
> +dnl
> +dnl GEANY_CHECK_PYTHON
> +dnl For gtkdoc header generation
> +dnl
> +AC_DEFUN([GEANY_CHECK_PYTHON],
> +[
> +	AM_PATH_PYTHON([2.7], [], [])

> You must be kidding me right? Python 2.7 is over 5 years old. python 3
> is even older (nearly 8 years). "Recent" is not quite right. Even
> depending on py3 would be perfectly reasonable but I still made the
> effort to make it 2.7 compatible. Anyway, I dont have something older
> than 2.7 so I can't actually tell. Might work with older versions.

I'm not kidding or suggesting 2.7 is bad, I was mostly curious whether
there was an actual reason for requiring 2.7, or if it was just that you
didn't knew whether or not it worked on older versions.

I don't mind, at worse it disables the GtkDoc header, and us developers
have it anyway I guess.


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890/files#r53483227
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160219/f94c5eab/attachment.html>


More information about the Github-comments mailing list