[Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: SVN-URL on git

[Matthew Brush]

On 11-12-04 06:09 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't found the conclusion on the discussion: What was the outcome
> on this topic? Which reference to old svn shall be inserted into git
> repo?
>

The conclusion is that the SVN-URL in the commit message is a valid SVN 
URL to checkout that commit, so is fine.  My complaint was that it was a 
broken URL that didn't work, but I didn't realize it was not a 
web-browser link, it's a link to work with SVN client.

First I mentioned it in the original thread:

**** FROM OTHER THREAD ****
On 11-11-04 04:03 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
 > Le 04/11/2011 23:28, Jiří Techet a écrit :
 >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 03:18, Matthew Brush wrote:
 >> OK, thanks. So is there any "official" conclusion which format should
 >> be used? (I don't have any strong preference here.)
 >
 > I'd personally prefer to have a valid SVN URL rather than a valid HTTP
 > link, but again, I don't mind much.
 >

Thanks for pointing out now *after* so much time and discussion that the 
existing URL *was a valid SVN URL*.  I'm glad I wasted my time :)
</sarcasm>

@Jiri
I'd say it's your call, in light of this new information, I'd say leave 
it as is and get it done as soon as you have time (assuming no one else 
objects).
**** END FROM OTHER THREAD ***

And then I clarified in your later thread since probably you didn't read 
the first thread and mentioned it still being an open issue:

**** FROM OTHER THREAD ****
On 11/15/2011 08:55 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
 > Hi developers,
 >
 > It has been a while when I first announced a mail about my idea of
 > process after transition of geany-plugins repository. As from my
 > understand the only open point is to have clarified the
 > svn-url-reference question its a good point to tell you what I'm
 > thinking of.
 >

The point is closed, see the thread, apologies for not making that clear 
enough. IIUC it's basically just a matter of someone pushing the repo 
unless people have committed to SVN in the meantime I guess it needs to 
be re-processed....
**** END FROM OTHER THREAD ***

I guess this could be a third time that I can say it *THERE ARE NO 
PENDING ISSUES, PLEASE PUSH THE PLUGINS TO GIT ALREADY!*  :)

Cheers,
Matthew Brush