[Geany-devel] Git switch

[Frank Lanitz]

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:56 +0100
Nick Treleaven <nick.treleaven at btinternet.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:22:05 +0200
> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> 
> > > > > > I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and
> > > > > > GIT. We use SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal
> > > > > > projects. I like GIT better than SVN.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > In my humble opinion you shouldn't switch unless you are
> > > > > > unhappy with sourceforge / svn.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I agree. For our current development process I don't see any
> > > > > big need to change away from SVN. It will cost a lot of
> > > > > effort with no extra profit adding. 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to second that.  And, while I use local Git repository
> > > > for Geany, I'm completely happy with git-svn (and my separate
> > > > SVN branch, of course :).
> > > 
> > > I agree. Same here. 
> > 
> > Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can
> > indeed save us the whole trouble of discussing about switching :).
> 
> To be honest, it would be some hassle for me to switch. I only have
> experience using Git locally, no push/pull/branches. But that
> experience was great, I like the tool.
> 
> So I think as Lex has suggested, that we shouldn't switch right now.
> Maybe some time in the future. I don't have time ATM to
> learn Git/investigate switching.
> 
> Also as regards sourceforge, I agree with Enrico that we want to stay
> with them for now at least.

I completely second this.

Cheers, 
Frank 
-- 
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100619/1ed2ca80/attachment.pgp>