[Geany-devel] ANN: Configurable build beta in trunk

[Enrico Tröger]

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:54:16 +1000, Lex wrote:

>2009/8/27 Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de>:
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:05:23 +0200, Enrico wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:43:52 +0100, Nick wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:35:54 +1000
>>>>Lex Trotman <elextr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is a significant change which provides considerable
>>>>> flexibility for configuring the operation of the build menu.
>>>>>  Please read the manual for the new capabilities ;-) including
>>>>> hidden settings.
>>>>...
>>>>> Let us know of any other problems, or good things too of
>>>>> course :-)
>>>>
>>>>I've been using the new build code today, I like the extra
>>>>configurability, thanks Lex (and Thomas) :)
>>>>
>>>>I noticed some things though:
>>>>
>>>>1. Make keybindings don't work properly. The Make All keybinding
>>>>seems to run the Compile command (e.g. for C source files). The
>>>>Make Object keybinding doesn't do anything at all.
>>>>
>>>>2. I think the current working directory should be used by default
>>>>for Make Object, not the project directory - presumably that
>>>>doesn't work even for a non-recursive makefile as the relative path
>>>>isn't there. (I mean for source files in a subdirectory from the
>>>>project base path). This would preserve pre-merge behaviour.
>>>
>>>Additionally, the Run command behaviour has changed:
>>>it uses something different as working directory as before. In my
>>>"geany" project, I set
>>>_build_/default/geany -v -c ...
>>>as Run command and this was executed in the project's base directory
>>>before, now I get a file not found error, so it is obviously using
>>>something different. After I set %p in the build settings as working
>>>directory it worked, but for consistency with the pre-merge
>>>behaviour, this should be default (for projects).
>>
>> One more thing, sorry.
>> I remember we talked about removing the second Run command which was
>> special for LaTeX. Then you added the second Run command generally
>> (which I actually do like since today because I had an use case
>> for :D). But we lost the keybinding for the second Run command
>> anyway. Was this a mistake or on purpose?
>>
>> It might be a missed something, if so, don't beat too much...:).
>
>No beatings necessary,
>The extra execute menu item is no longer a known command, its an
>variable command.
>Only the known commands have keybindings for now.

Alright, got it.
Thanks.



Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090829/79424d40/attachment.pgp>