> Confusingly, doxygen seems to pickup the header's signature even though the doc comment is in the .c file.
I guess it makes sense since what's in the header is what the user can actually see/use.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/commit/6e5ca69e2e9ddbfc2cc44527a1aa5fca8db09…
hm something slipped through. IIRC I changed it from gint to gboolean sometime during review process, and it seems I forgot the header. Confusingly, doxygen seems to pickup the header's signature even though the doc comment is in the .c file.
The header should probably be fixed to match the source file, since IIUC gboolean and gint are ABI-compatible?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/commit/6e5ca69e2e9ddbfc2cc44527a1aa5fca8db09…
I got the following warning when I opened several files using xargs.
```
** (geany:626): WARNING **: (bridge.c:993):atk_bridge_adaptor_init: runtime check failed: (root)
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2208