[Geany] compile, build, run for custom filetype
spir
denis.spir at xxxxx
Tue Feb 7 16:29:42 UTC 2012
On 02/06/2012 09:11 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
> PS Note there is a wiki entry on configuring the build system at
> http://wiki.geany.org/howtos/configurebuildmenu
First, thank you and bravo for this wiki page on the topic. It is great
and above all clear. Reading it not only helped but also launched a few
comments to possibly still ameliorate the system on details, and a 2
questions on remaining obscure points.
If ever I finally understand things well enough, I'll help and improve
the wiki page. Also add one on settings for Go, and possibly a general
one on how to introduce a new language (this badly lacks in geany doc).
*** Questions ***
* toolbar buttons?
The relation between the build menu config (either in files or via GUI)
and toolbar is unclear for me. I guess --because it seems to work that
way on my machine-- that
~ If ever, resulting from config, there are "Compile" & "Build" entries
in the 1st section of the menu, then they map to matching buttons.
~ The Execute button's command is always set by the Execute line of the
menu, meaning in config the first line of the fourth section.
If true, then I find that difficult to get. I tried both in files and
through GUI to set an Execute command, like the Compile & Build ones,
which doubled the predefined one without any effect. Conversely, why is
there no predefined entries for the Compile & Build like for Execute?
Sure, they do not apply to interpreted languages, but the entries could
still be there, no?
* Relation between config files & GUI settings?
What happens to the config after changing settings on the GUI. They
double the files' role. What kind of relation are there between GUI
setting and config files, in both relations? Who wins? The page pointed
above lists the "cascade" of config locations in files, but does not
include the GUI settings. Conversely, what happens to the GUI settings
after changing files?
I think we may do without these GUI that double and complicate the
config system. Simply, the config files would as standard propose
parameter lines equivalent to the present GUI, and the doc would state
that it is recommended to stop there. ("With power comes responsability")
*** Comments ***
* Build Menu orga
It may be reorganised so that the 3 configurable sections (out of 5)
come 1st, 2nd, 3rd. And --is it possible to have a bigger separation
with the other 2 sections?
* No dealing with system config
The user ideally should not have to deal at all with system-general
config files, which also deal as geany defaults IIUC.
Possible solution: In the latest versions, there are entries in the
'Tools' menu to allow editing some config files directly in geany
itself. One of this entries allows editing filetypes.common; if the user
version does not yet exist (in the user config folder), it is then
created by copy (from the system config folder). Add one entry to edit
user filetype config files. Do the same as for filetypes.common. To
select the filetype: (1) a submenu like for setting the filetype (2) a
popup with a rolling list (3) a popup with a text field to type the
(case-insensitive) filetype name.
* Easy config of new filetype
This would deal as recommended way to create a *new* filetype: open an
existing one for edition in geany, save it at once as config file for
the new filetype, edit it. There should be a standard one having the
structure and entries with common sensible values, for cases when no
appropriate model filetype exists (present filetypes.Geany.conf seems to
be configured for Vala). Entries for which no sensible value exist
should be present anyway, so that the user knows about them.
* No "filetypes.Lang.conf"
Filetype config files should all have the same naming pattern. For a new
language, instead of filetypes.Lang.conf, why not just filetypes.lang?
In addition, having the name capitalised only for new filetypes is a
source of annoying issues.
* Filetype config file names
Better, also solve this: filetype config files are often edited in geany
(else, other editors also have styling for common languages). Since the
names of the config files end in the name of the languge, thjey are
styled as if they were source code of this language, instead of just
config files.
Solution: reverse the logic, or rather reset it as should be: lang.cfg
instead of filetypes.lang.
* no tweaking of filetype_extensions.conf
Filetype extensions should be declared in the filetype config file.
Actually, all the config for a filetype should be in a single file. I
first thought there could be no filetype_extensions.conf at all, but
this may force geany to read all filetype confg files at startup.
Instead, there could a generated one, updated when filetype config files
are edited in geany, or whenever geany detects a modif (by last edition
time), or via the menu entry "Tools/Reload Configuration".
* config file doc
Comments in config files may be rewtritten (they have improved, but
still..).
Some param names can be clearer. (Naming is doc.)
Denis
More information about the Users
mailing list