[Geany] Changes to documentation
russelldickenson at xxxxx
Fri Nov 4 04:42:31 UTC 2011
On 4 November 2011 11:18, Matthew Brush <mbrush at codebrainz.ca> wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 06:08 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> On 4 November 2011 11:58, Matthew Brush<mbrush at codebrainz.ca> wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2011 03:34 PM, Russell Dickenson wrote:
>>>> I am currently contibuting to the Geany newsletter, some of which
>>>> includes explanations of Geany's features. Some of what I have written
>>>> could be used to expand the Geany documentation and I wondering how I
>>>> do that? Is it maintained in an existing git repo and if so: which one
>>>> and would I be able to be given commit access to it?
>>> Hi Russell,
>>> The manual itself is generated from the doc/geany.txt to make the
>>> file. You need to clone the geany repository, change into the `doc`
>>> directory and type `make doc` which will re-generate the documentation.
>>> To do it, you need `rst2html` which is in the `python-docutils` on
>>> Debian/Ubuntu/friends. I guess you already know this and how to use
>>> restructured text from the newsletter.
>> Hi Russel,
>> Not that I'd ever disagree with Matthew :) ...
>> But I suggest you only submit changes to the Geany.txt and let the
>> committer generate the HTML document. That doesn't mean that you
>> might not want to generate it just to check that it looks ok, but it
>> is better just to submit the source IMNSHO.
> That makes sense.
>> If you are confident of your ReST you can just do it all in Github,
>> like I did for the pull request I sent on the newsletter.
>>> For some reason we're committing changes to the generated documentation
>>> into VCS, though I have some feelings about this :), so your commits
>>> include the generated geany.html file as well as the geany.txt file (not
>>> sure if other files will change, but I don't think so).
>> Nothing else should change. Reasons for VCSing the HTML were
>> "discussed" elsewhere :)
> I guess I should search the ML archives to see what's up with that :)
> Matthew Brush
Matthew and Lex,
Thanks for your replies. I think I'll clone the repo and make pull
requests, at least for a start. That way my proposed changes can first
be reviewed for style, consistency, spelling etc and pull-ed if
More information about the Users