[Geany] Minor source touchups

[Nick Treleaven]

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:40:58 -0500
"Daniel Richard G." <skunk at iSKUNK.ORG> wrote:

> * Various cases of foo() --> foo(void). (Come on guys... the only excuse is 
>   if you're older than dirt and still haven't broken your old K&R habits :)

Or you are used to C++ or C99 ;-) My brain keeps saying the 'void'
is redundant. But I updated my function snippet a while ago to do it
for me usually.

But the real problem is that gcc doesn't warn about it (or I haven't
found an option for gcc 4.1 anyway).

Thanks for the patch though.

Regards,
Nick