[Geany] Symbol list whitespace

[Harold Aling]

<E1Iu7vq-0002Bq-2d at zonbu.sait.intra>
<20071119163738.cbc440b6.enrico.troeger at uvena.de>
<20071119163436.3905beb7.nick.treleaven at btinternet.com> <20071119180800.6a17b380.enrico.troeger at uvena.de>
Message-ID: <4bab83019aae9871db6d5a9f4d780902 at localhost>
X-Sender: h.aling at home.nl
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-svn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:08:00 +0100, Enrico Tröger
<enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> > Ok, I tried a darker background but it doesn't look good with the
>> > icons and so I committed some changes to make the section name bold.
>> > At the moment this affects also the sections if the expanders are
>> > shown. Right now, I'm not sure whether it looks good or whether it
>> > should be disabled for the usual view. Any opinions?
>> 
>> I haven't tried it yet, but there's also the option of setting an
>> extra indent when expanders are hidden - this is in the 2.12 API.
> Yes of course. I read about while adding the hidden expanders pref. But
> I forget it again because it only adds an additional indentation but
> now, with hidden expanders, it's just what we need.
> Harold and the others, isn't it better to use some small indentation if
> expanders are hidden instead of bold sections?
> So, much space is saved by removing the expanders and a little is added
> to keep it readable.

Whatever suits you best... I'm all about the saved space, but readibility
is important too.

If the indentation is not too wide, it'll probably be the best option...
(although the 'bold' headings were not so bad either).

Your call, I'm undecided...


-H-