[Geany] Symbol list whitespace

[Nick Treleaven]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:37:38 +0100
Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:49:02 +0100, Harold Aling <h.aling at home.nl>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:12:50 +0100, Enrico Tröger
> > <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:19:18 +0000, Nick Treleaven
> > > <nick.treleaven at btinternet.com> wrote:
> > >> I just noticed for Gtk 2.12 (which I don't have yet ;-)) there's
> > >> an option to hide expanders, which can also disable indentation
> > >> - see gtk_tree_view_set_show_expanders(). Perhaps for Gtk 2.12
> > >> it could be
> > > I added a hidden pref for this. With hidden expanders there is no
> > > more indentation at all, i.e. you can't distinguish between
> > > sections and symbols anymore. IMO, a hidden pref is sufficient for
> > > that, the documentation is updated. The hidden pref is called:
> > > show_symbol_list_expanders, default is TRUE.
> > 
> > I just checked out this hidden pref, and I like it!
> > 
> > Although, it'll probably look a bit better if the headings
> > (Funcions, Variables, etc) were a bit more distinct (bold/darker
> > background/etc).
> Ok, I tried a darker background but it doesn't look good with the
> icons and so I committed some changes to make the section name bold.
> At the moment this affects also the sections if the expanders are
> shown. Right now, I'm not sure whether it looks good or whether it
> should be disabled for the usual view. Any opinions?

I haven't tried it yet, but there's also the option of setting an
extra indent when expanders are hidden - this is in the 2.12 API.

http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/GtkTreeView.html#gtk-tree-view-set-level-indentation

Regards,
Nick