[Geany] More Features

Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger at xxxxx
Mon Nov 19 15:55:02 UTC 2007


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:16:46 +0100, Bo Lorentsen <bl at lue.dk> wrote:

> John Gabriele wrote:
> 
> > Nope. I haven't done anything yet with Geany's plug-in system.
> > Actually, I've been holding out hope that someone writes a Python
> > plug-in for it -- similar to Jeff's nice Lua plug-in. Nothing
> > against Lua, but I already know Python, and currently, the next
> > extension language in my queue to learn is elisp.
> Hmm, I am sure Lua is much faster to learn than elisp :-)
> 
> Ok, I like to see a emacs binding plugin, but I'm am not sure I'm
> able to make the needed changes myself.
> 
> > I think that if there were an Emacs key-binding-compatibility
> > plug-in, the goal should be to make it as authentic as possible.
> > The "two key combinations" (that is, using prefix keys) is an
> > important component of the bindings. They actually hierarchically
> > organize commands quite nicely. Any anyway, if Geany were to have
> > Emacs bindings, I'm guessing that the point would probably be to
> > allow current Emacs users to easily move between Emacs and Geany
> > (thus it would be beneficial to be as similar as possible).
> And when that works vi have all the vi (vim) users that like the
> same :-)
This sounds to me like are reason to not implement plugin keybinding
support ;-). Did I ever mention Geany is not emacs and vi? ;-)

Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.key
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071119/3ca60f39/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Users mailing list