<blockquote>
<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=713965" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/techee">@techee</a> <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=77077" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/masatake">@masatake</a> what about Geany's c.c having a lot of extra stuff (even extra languages IIUC)? I don't watch uctags much, but last I looked any attempt to import that was abandoned.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, that will definitely not be done by me :-). However, I think that the first step for Geany could be to switch to the new cxx parser for C/C++ and not to use the parser of these languages from c.c. Then the C/C++ portion of c.c could be removed completely and I think especially C++ contributes by the largest amount of code. The same could be done with the upstream c.c and it might be much easier to merge what remains.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2119#issuecomment-486585188">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIOWJ47OPBB4XLP3O6IJDTPSFYOFANCNFSM4HEAA74Q">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAIOWJ7Q53XZWO6X4J4A76DPSFYOFANCNFSM4HEAA74Q.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/geany/geany","title":"geany/geany","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/geany/geany"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@techee in #2119: \u003e @techee @masatake what about Geany's c.c having a lot of extra stuff (even extra languages IIUC)? I don't watch uctags much, but last I looked any attempt to import that was abandoned.\r\n\r\nWell, that will definitely not be done by me :-). However, I think that the first step for Geany could be to switch to the new cxx parser for C/C++ and not to use the parser of these languages from c.c. Then the C/C++ portion of c.c could be removed completely and I think especially C++ contributes by the largest amount of code. The same could be done with the upstream c.c and it might be much easier to merge what remains."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2119#issuecomment-486585188"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2119#issuecomment-486585188",
"url": "https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2119#issuecomment-486585188",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>