<blockquote>
<p>Geany doesn't prevent you from print()-ing</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I did not say you could not print() output with Geany.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The same way how SciTE got this feature, Geany could get it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Based on <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1731#issuecomment-354576202">elextr last comment</a>, I seriously doubt that.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There are no features in Geany which someone spent time coding but didn't want/need. All functionality comes from people seeing a need or wanting a feature and then contributing it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's some weird argumentation if you ask me ... sound to me your trying to say:<br>
"<em>If its not there ... it must be not 'that' useful. As any (and all) Geany user that felt the want/need for it could and would have coded/added it to Geany</em>"<br>
... If only things where 'that' simple ...</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1731#issuecomment-384039544">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDrJ4bv_l5ewXq6bd8bJA4UDFP6hE2qks5tr3NcgaJpZM4RPeJO">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABDrJxuyxTbvp9GS3jtaxPMXfe7gbK8bks5tr3NcgaJpZM4RPeJO.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1731#issuecomment-384039544"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/geany/geany","title":"geany/geany","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/geany/geany"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@MvGulik in #1731: \u003eGeany doesn't prevent you from print()-ing\r\n\r\nI did not say you could not print() output with Geany.\r\n\r\n\u003eThe same way how SciTE got this feature, Geany could get it.\r\n\r\nBased on [elextr last comment](https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1731#issuecomment-354576202), I seriously doubt that.\r\n\r\n\u003eThere are no features in Geany which someone spent time coding but didn't want/need. All functionality comes from people seeing a need or wanting a feature and then contributing it.\r\n\r\nThat's some weird argumentation if you ask me ... sound to me your trying to say: \r\n\"_If its not there ... it must be not 'that' useful. As any (and all) Geany user that felt the want/need for it could and would have coded/added it to Geany_\"\r\n... If only things where 'that' simple ...\r\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1731#issuecomment-384039544"}}}</script>