<p>LGBI.</p>

<p>Regarding <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/commit/61ce270e761347221c41ae2fa7a04075a9bd9487" class="commit-link"><tt>61ce270</tt></a>, it probably makes sense impl-wise, but the "old" stack layout makes sense too: it's always the same, and we just move back or forth (so we get them in the opposite order).  You changes makes the unto and redo action layout different (mirrored), but yeah in the impl side it might make more sense not to have everything done when redoing <code>UNDO_SCINTILLA</code>.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1161#issuecomment-237541088">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDrJ6zSoyr02KbFV56XfQ1LzdV64iP9ks5qcd4VgaJpZM4JcDh-">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABDrJ74pGku4d1gV9jRpSqPvgXJ4zoQNks5qcd4VgaJpZM4JcDh-.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1161#issuecomment-237541088"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/geany/geany","title":"geany/geany","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/modules/aws/aws-bg.jpg","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/geany/geany"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@b4n in #1161: LGBI.\r\n\r\nRegarding 61ce270e761347221c41ae2fa7a04075a9bd9487, it probably makes sense impl-wise, but the \"old\" stack layout makes sense too: it's always the same, and we just move back or forth (so we get them in the opposite order).  You changes makes the unto and redo action layout different (mirrored), but yeah in the impl side it might make more sense not to have everything done when redoing `UNDO_SCINTILLA`."}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1161#issuecomment-237541088"}}}</script>