<blockquote>
<p>BTW, if we provide GIR, do we need continuing distributing gtkdoc headers? Seems redundant to me, ain't it? </p>
</blockquote>

<p>I don't need them for anything else. Feel free to drop un-install them.</p>

<p>I pushed a temporary brach to peasy which uses the .gir shipped by Geany (with this PR): <a href="https://github.com/kugel-/peasy/tree/gir-from-geany">https://github.com/kugel-/peasy/tree/gir-from-geany</a></p>

<p>Seems to work fine. I also checked that the .vapi still generates correctly (i.e. not a constructor) and that's the case.</p>

<p>So yea, I'm happy if this PR lands (maybe even for 1.28?) <g-emoji alias="+1" fallback-src="https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/icons/emoji/unicode/1f44d.png">👍</g-emoji> </p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1112#issuecomment-230488947">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABDrJz_sNkJ5Mj5GXLOZKfx2B3gWp36Qks5qSmWrgaJpZM4JD5zE">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABDrJ_mJ1h73QONaItkIcOF80lLHgYy1ks5qSmWrgaJpZM4JD5zE.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1112#issuecomment-230488947"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>