<p>In <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890#discussion_r52639416">doc/Makefile.am</a>:</p>
<pre style='color:#555'>>  
> -all-local: Doxyfile.stamp
> +Doxyfile.stamp: Doxyfile Doxyfile-gi $(doxygen_sources)
> +  $(AM_V_GEN)$(DOXYGEN) Doxyfile-gi && $(DOXYGEN) Doxyfile && echo "" > $@
</pre>
<div class="email-fragment">Am 11. Februar 2016 18:38:18 MEZ, schrieb Colomban Wendling <notifications@github.com>:</div>
<div class="email-quoted-reply">>
> -all-local: Doxyfile.stamp
> +Doxyfile.stamp: Doxyfile Doxyfile-gi $(doxygen_sources)
> +  $(AM_V_GEN)$(DOXYGEN) Doxyfile-gi && $(DOXYGEN) Doxyfile && echo ""
> $@

BTW, will Doxygen reuse some of its findings for the second run?  I
know you'll hate me because we wanted separate doxyfiles not to alter
the existing doc, but as Docygen is relatively slow, if it could reuse
its database or something it'd be super nice :)

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
<a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890/files#r52637124">https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890/files#r52637124</a>
</div>
<div class="email-fragment">No, you can't have both. This was one of the reasons for me preferring a single doxyfile</div>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890/files#r52639416">view it on GitHub</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABDrJ2Rx7Ly0uIZpmDPK2USnewameOK4ks5pjMJZgaJpZM4HM9VD.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890/files#r52639416"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>