Its not really optional since it won't be possible to make introspecting<br>
plugins without it.<br>
<br>
On 27 January 2016 at 16:19, Thomas Martitz <notifications@github.com><br>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> BTW, There are already two ruby scripts in the tree, so I'm surprised this<br>
> one is a problem given its optional.<br>
><br>
> —<br>
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<br>
> <https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890#issuecomment-175424878>.<br>
><br>


<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890#issuecomment-175427733">view it on GitHub</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABDrJyBPAO4yw3OzQCFRRPtHWIEQuWgJks5peFrkgaJpZM4HM9VD.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/890#issuecomment-175427733"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>