[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Status of ctags parsers in Geany (Issue #3170)

[Jiří Techet]

> Matlab: nearly every other tool uses Regex parsers successfully, I doubt matlab files are big, IIUC they tend to be lots of small ones.

Well, I don't care much myself, we could switch to the regex parser too. (On the other hand I find it quite nice that we got rid of all the regex parsers so this one would be the only outlier.)

> C.C: [shudder] whats the state of ctags for Java, C#, D, Vala? If they are likely to be similar to Geany in capability "soon" why remove C, C++, Vera and make the other changes? Why not just leave it there until we can finally drive a stake through C.C? [trying to save you work]

So I can sync geany_c.c and ctags c.c more easily and don't see the the C, C++ and Vera garbage we don't care about.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3170#issuecomment-1100636000
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/issues/3170/1100636000 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20220416/4a3b92cc/attachment.htm>