[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Improve handling of anonymous tags (PR #3059)

[elextr]

I havn't looked at the details yet.

But points 1 and 2 sound sane.  

Points 3 and 4 sound useful so long as the kind[^1] is right.

Point 5 would be a good improvement, the disconnect between the struct and the typedef was annoying. What happens with this if a declaration that has both the struct name and the typedef?

[^1]: using "kind" in the common type theory meaning of "classification system for types" eg "struct" "class" etc

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3059#issuecomment-997779300
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3059/c997779300 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20211220/aa51d9a9/attachment.htm>