[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Rewrite Python standard library tags creation script for Python 3 (PR #3039)

Jiří Techet notifications at xxxxx
Tue Dec 7 09:15:34 UTC 2021


The question now is whether not to switch to the ctags file format for the languages which have identical implementation (and therefore kind letters) both in Geany and ctags. I don't know what the script does exactly but if we switched to the ctags file format, wouldn't it be sufficient to run the ctags binary on the corresponding directory with sources?

The "proprietary" half-binary format is still useful for our unit tests since it already contains ctags kinds mapped to our internal representation so we can verify this mapping is done correctly. But for the tag files shipped with Geany I think we are more or less ready to switch to the ctags file format and suggest users to use ctags to generate it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3039#issuecomment-987721670
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20211207/952de8d2/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Github-comments mailing list