[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Question: adding a kind to exising parser of u-ctags (#2227)

[Colomban Wendling]

Late on my part, but just to support @elextr's point: don't worry about Geany for extending parsers.  We definitely don't want slowing down uctags development, and as mentioned we already have what's needed to detect what needs be updated when pulling a new uctags version.

The API tlib should really care about is the part that allows selecting a parser and calling it, e.g. the C API Geany can use; what each parser reports does not really matter but for how useful it is.  I guess the breaking of the tlib test case just happens because we gotta check *something* to see if all is well, not really because we *require* this output.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2227#issuecomment-515426285
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20190726/775c7de9/attachment.html>