[Github-comments] [geany/geany] build.c: Remove g_ptr_array_foreach with gpointer user_data & update HACKING (#2270)

Matthew Brush notifications at xxxxx
Sat Aug 24 18:17:04 UTC 2019


codebrainz commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2577,15 +2565,20 @@ void build_save_menu(GKeyFile *config, gpointer ptr, GeanyBuildSource src)
 				g_key_file_remove_key(config, build_grp_name, "error_regex", NULL);
 			if (pj->priv->build_filetypes_list != NULL)
 			{
-				data.config = config;
-				data.ft_names = g_ptr_array_new();
-				g_ptr_array_foreach(pj->priv->build_filetypes_list, foreach_project_filetype, (gpointer)(&data));
-				if (data.ft_names->pdata != NULL)
+				GPtrArray *ft_names = g_ptr_array_new();
+				guint i;
+				
+				foreach_ptr_array(ft, i, pj->priv->build_filetypes_list)

> But what about things that people often get wrong, like not checking doc->is_valid, I think the foreach_document macro is worth having. is_valid is a Geany-specific thing, so it's easy to justify a macro here. Sure, make it upper-case though.

If there's an actual reason for it, sure. But what is the reason we keep invalid documents around? If there is a good reason to do that (like not premature optimization), I would tend to agree such a macro may be useful, but probably located in the `document.h` file and as we all agree upper-case.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2270#discussion_r317370461
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20190824/1b03ae87/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Github-comments mailing list