[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Upstream or alternative solution for ctags regex parsers (#2119)

Masatake YAMATO notifications at xxxxx
Wed Apr 24 19:06:36 UTC 2019


After merging #2132, I think I should stop introducing new code to ctags side.
How about moving libctags code to u-ctags?
If it is in u-ctags side, I can take care not to break the interface.
You can add a test case that represents an expectation of Geany side. 
I don't want Geany people to take time for synchronizing code.

Should I open an issue at Geany issue tracker or U-ctags issue tracker?



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2119#issuecomment-486385497
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20190424/9f3f475c/attachment.html>


More information about the Github-comments mailing list