[Github-comments] [geany/geany] An insufficient behavior when an open file was updated outside Geany (#1885)

[dyura]

I reopen this issue. I really was using “cancel+save as“ or, even better, “save as+cancel”. But, why should we use two operations instead of one? In this case “Save as” has exactly the same priority as overwrite and reload. I added "Save As" button in my copy, and you can see the attached screen shot. The message bar doesn't look terrible.![screenshot from 2018-10-28 15-29-16](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/39743460/47690625-21635b80-dbc5-11e8-9fb1-4db6c50f9758.png) I also renamed Cancel button. It is semantics, but I believe "Ignore" is more clear in case of multiple choice. The pull request will follow.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1885#issuecomment-434143775
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20181029/c95bd335/attachment.html>