[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Start porting to GSettings (#1257)

[elextr]

You just outlined the sorts of things I am concerned about quite well, as I said, Geany does not have any support for asynchronous changes now, so just how complex is the "spaghetti" to implement it for the settings that don't work by the simple automatic bindings.  Thats all I'm asking to know, how difficult are the hard things, before we do lots of simple things, and then go "oh shit" when we hit a hard thing :).

And you noted some other considerations I hadn't thought of, the logical correctness of doing automatic settings update.  That may mean more settings won't be able to use automagic bindings either.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1257#issuecomment-251868465
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20161005/d08f433d/attachment.html>