[Github-comments] [geany] Towards gvfs-fuse independence (#963)

[Colomban Wendling]

Looks mostly sensible.  But all this `GFile` creation, and this making Geany use GIO more and more makes me wonder: don't we rather want to have a `GFile` member attached to a document in addition to the path, and have this `NULL` when not using GIO?  That would re-use the same link all the way, and possibly might prevent some oddies when loading from an URI and writing to a path (when *gvfs-fuse* is available) -- I doubt it should be a problem, but still, could be suboptimal I guess.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/963#issuecomment-198804732
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160319/0d81a7f6/attachment.html>