[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Gi signals (#1038)

[Thomas Martitz]

> @@ -3813,3 +3813,14 @@ void document_grab_focus(GeanyDocument *doc)
>  
>  	gtk_widget_grab_focus(GTK_WIDGET(doc->editor->sci));
>  }
> +
> +static void        *copy_(void *src) { return src; }
> +static void         free_(void *doc) { }
> +
> +/** Gets the GType of GeanyDocument
> + *
> + * @return the GeanyDocument type */

<rant>
What makes you all think my plugin doesn't want a stable gir interface? It seems to me that there's a notion "let's make it @gironly so we can change it any time", just because these symbols aren't immediately useful for c plugins.

This is not what I wanted. I wanted the gir exposed api to be just a different representation of the original plugin api (baring bugs), with the same stability consideration.

My peasy plugin is depending on the gir in the same way as C API. But you seem to treat it differently, as something that can be broken without consideration.
</rant>

But if that's how it's acceptable for you, so be it. Can add @gironly to this too.





---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1038/files/eb3a1a6edf796e71bcd688a1f0e689416856ff25#r67760693
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160620/5378d863/attachment.html>