[Github-comments] [geany] Rewrite scope completion 3 (#862)

[Jiří Techet]

> This really should have been a separate PR, not make a huge PR bigger, 

@elextr Good point, dropped the patch, will post it separately once this is merged. 

> and I suspect that the huge PR could have been split in the first place.

The patches are so related that it would be really hard to do. If I knew from the very beginning about all the possible problems and knew exactly what needs to be addressed, it could have been a much smaller patch set. But rewriting the patches now would be a huge amount of work.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/862#issuecomment-170500045
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160111/90cafe52/attachment.html>