[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Ctags sync, part 1 (#1160)
Colomban Wendling
notifications at xxxxx
Mon Aug 8 20:45:23 UTC 2016
> @@ -2234,12 +2232,12 @@ static boolean skipPostArgumentStuff (statementInfo *const st,
> {
> switch (c)
> {
> - case ')': break;
> - case ':': skipMemIntializerList (token);break; /* ctor-initializer */
> - case '[': skipToMatch ("[]"); break;
> - case '=': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> - case '{': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> - case '}': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> + case ')': break;
> + case ':': skipMemIntializerList (token);break; /* ctor-initializer */
> + case '[': skipToMatch ("[]"); break;
> + case '=': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> + case '{': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> + case '}': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
that one looks odd, but well.
though, I highly doubt we'll merge *c.c* from U-CTags, as we have *different* things in it, and that they have another C++ one anyway. I'll probably try to extract the Vala part to a separate parser (I already started a while back IIRC, experimenting with other stuff in the way), and we'll "only" be left with like 3 parsers in there, that have probably diverged a lot less.
Though OTOH maybe yeah, when it's down to C#/Java/Vera/D it might start and be mergable.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1160/files/11dcc5e3e5a0014905fbb76457b52991135dc410..9745d470c6288d88b455436a918f92e13e271df4#r73950773
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160808/822977d4/attachment.html>
More information about the Github-comments
mailing list