[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Ctags sync, part 1 (#1160)

Colomban Wendling notifications at xxxxx
Mon Aug 8 20:45:23 UTC 2016


> @@ -2234,12 +2232,12 @@ static boolean skipPostArgumentStuff (statementInfo *const st,
>  	{
>  		switch (c)
>  		{
> -			case ')':				break;
> -			case ':': skipMemIntializerList (token);break;	/* ctor-initializer */
> -			case '[': skipToMatch ("[]");			break;
> -			case '=': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE;	break;
> -			case '{': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE;	break;
> -			case '}': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE;	break;
> +		case ')':                               break;
> +		case ':': skipMemIntializerList (token);break;  /* ctor-initializer */
> +		case '[': skipToMatch ("[]");           break;
> +		case '=': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE;    break;
> +		case '{': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE;    break;
> +		case '}': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE;    break;

that one looks odd, but well.

though, I highly doubt we'll merge *c.c* from U-CTags, as we have *different* things in it, and that they have another C++ one anyway.  I'll probably try to extract the Vala part to a separate parser (I already started a while back IIRC, experimenting with other stuff in the way), and we'll "only" be left with like 3 parsers in there, that have probably diverged a lot less.
Though OTOH maybe yeah, when it's down to C#/Java/Vera/D it might start and be mergable.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1160/files/11dcc5e3e5a0014905fbb76457b52991135dc410..9745d470c6288d88b455436a918f92e13e271df4#r73950773
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20160808/822977d4/attachment.html>


More information about the Github-comments mailing list