[Geany-devel] geany-plugins: Bleeding-edge compatibility

[Frank Lanitz]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200
Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+geany at sardemff7.net> wrote:

> On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote:
> > An explanation would be useful.
> > 
> > For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with 
> > GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for 
> > GLib?
> 
> Yes, and yes.
> 
> 
> > If the answer to those is yes, it looks fine to apply as is. Even
> > if the answer is no, the patch shouldn't harm anything besides 
> > cluttering up the code a little bit.
> 
> Attached a new patch with a better commit message.

With a view onto
http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2012-May/006824.html
Is this fine to append? 


Cheers, 
Frank
-- 
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120509/e49f57c1/attachment.pgp>