dimitar.zhekov at xxxxx
Sun Mar 11 19:25:29 UTC 2012
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:33:07 +1100
Lex Trotman <elextr at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think much is needed:
> 1. Scintilla already provides the special symbol SC_MARK_AVAILABLE to
> indicate that the mark is available.
I already replied to this . Unless we want each plugin to allocate
it's markers for each document, possibly receiving different numbers,
we should have a bitmap in Geany.
> 3. When a plugin needs a marker for a document it should search for
> one that is available on that document and use that, and set it back
> to available when it no longer needs it and on unload. There are only
> 32 to search so it isn't IMHO worth implementing anything faster.
Oh, I see. So any plugin with markers must keep track of each document
it allocated markers in. This is not going to be fun.
> why should
> a C language plugin steal markers froma Python file when the Python
> plugin also needs them??
To be able to allocate markers #s in plugin_init(), and free them in
plugin_cleanup(). To be able to work without tracking document file
More information about the Devel