[Geany-devel] How about calling the next release 1.0?
yurand2 at xxxxx
Tue Sep 20 13:10:34 UTC 2011
But why only 1.0?
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
On 20/09/2011, Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz at student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
> Am Di, 20.09.2011, 13:43 schrieb Lex Trotman:
>> On 20 September 2011 21:23, Frank Lanitz <frank at frank.uvena.de> wrote:
>>> Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Ji?í Techet:
>>>> just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
>>>> the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
>>> To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead of next release I
>>> disagree. After 0.21 release we got a lot of structural changes we might
>>> could think about a 1.0 too, but I don't feel its needed at the moment.
>> I have to disagree with you on this Frank, the version number is
>> nothing to do with structural or technical issues, it is a project
>> issue. Changing the version number doesn't affect translation or
>> anything else that takes time to do, so it isn't going to delay the
> I agree. There's no reason to wait until after the upcoming release. 1.0:
> the earlier, the better.
> This release should be the most stable one ever made, so 1.0 is even more
> justified. 0.X simply isn't justified anymore. It sounds like Geany was
> alpha software, but it has indeed better release quality that the majority
> of software out there.
> Best regards.
> Geany-devel mailing list
> Geany-devel at uvena.de
More information about the Devel