[Geany-devel] GTK+ Version Bump to 2.18 - gtkbuilder and 2.16

[Lex Trotman]

On 18 October 2011 10:17, Matthew Brush <mbrush at codebrainz.ca> wrote:
> On 11-10-14 07:38 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>
>> On 13/10/2011 12:53, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13/10/2011 00:55, Matthew Brush wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So I would go for 2.16 overall if this brings us Glade 3 support.
>>>>
>>>> It should, but I haven't thoroughly tested it with GTK+ 2.16 yet. Did
>>>> you try the gtkbuilder branch yet on your 2.16 install by any chance?
>>>
>>> No, I haven't tried git branching yet. I'll let you know when I do.
>>
>> Tried it earlier, seems to build against 2.16 (I actually have a newer
>> runtime) and run OK after I applied some fixes. I didn't really test it
>> much besides showing the Prefs dialog. Anything in particular that needs
>> testing?
>>
>
> I also noticed some issues with defaults in the project dialog where some
> stuff doesn't have a default and some of the combo boxes have two columns
> showing so it looks like:
>
>        "Item 1  Item 1"
>        "Item 2  Item 2"
>
> IMO, it would *really* be nice to get all of the Project dialog ported to
> GtkBuilder since currently only the Editor and Indentation tabs are in
> GtkBuilder, the "Project" tab and the Build tab are both hard-coded and
> added to the dialog at runtime it seems.

Hi Matthew,

Yes, the build tab is generated at runtime because it has variable
length (set by the number_xx_menu_items prefs).

Possibly it could be a treeview, but that would change the whole
operation of the build tabs and would need discussion with Nick who
has strong ideas on the subject :)

Cheers
Lex

>
> Also, I think we should discuss a better organization for the tabs in the
> Project dialog, but first I'd like to get everything existing working.
>
> I'll follow up when that happends.
>
> Cheers,
> Matthew Brush
> _______________________________________________
> Geany-devel mailing list
> Geany-devel at uvena.de
> https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
>