[Geany-devel] Git conversion completed

Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger at xxxxx
Sun Oct 9 17:04:34 UTC 2011

On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 17:59:47 +0200, Colomban wrote:

>Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
>> <lists.ban at herbesfolles.org> wrote:
>>> Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
>>>> <lists.ban at herbesfolles.org> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> * 03c3b75 (r3679) is a bit weird too, it has d3cdd27 (r3680) as
>>>>> parent, but as the SVN revision suggests, d3cdd27 is newer than
>>>>> it (13:53:04 vs 13:45:47).  And I don't see from SVN log why this
>>>>> would be wanted.
>>>> This is apparently my error - judging from the date I should have
>>>> used d71d352 for "merge trunk changes". I'll fix that.
>>> Great, looking forward to it.  I think when this is done all is OK,
>>> so we could import it in the official repo :)
>> OK, I've re-uploaded the repositories to the same locations. I've
>> fixed the incorrect merge issue and updated parents for most of the
>> re-created branches.
>Yep, looks great, bravo!
>> The only one I haven't updated is the "Create branch for configurable
>> build menu development", now commit 80d2802. There's something
>> strange
>> - it appears the branch existed before but it was never merged into
>> trunk. Instead it was probably deleted and re-created again. If I
>> updated the parent to be the trunk only, we'd lose the history of
>> this branch because we couldn't get to the previous commits in any
>> way. So I think it's better to keep it the way it is.
>OK, makes sense, even though the old build-system branch was dropped
>because it was "corrupted" (according to r3939: "Removing corrupted

IIRC there were problems with the problems with the branch when Nick
tried to merge it back into trunk with an older SVN client than the one
the branch was created with. Or something like that.
Maybe Lex remembers more details. If not, it's probably not that
critical at all.

>So, I'm thinking of committing this, anybody has something to object?
>(speak within ~ the hour or be quiet forever :D)

/me is quiet.


Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111009/a6eff7fe/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Devel mailing list