[Geany-devel] Geany Plugins SVN Commit URLs

Colomban Wendling lists.ban at xxxxx
Sat Nov 5 13:04:48 UTC 2011

Le 05/11/2011 01:28, Matthew Brush a écrit :
> On 11-11-04 04:03 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> Le 04/11/2011 23:28, Jiří Techet a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 03:18, Matthew Brush<mbrush at codebrainz.ca> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> All on one line:
>>>> git filter-branch --msg-filter "sed -e
>>>> 's|svnroot/geany-plugins/trunk/geany-plugins@|viewvc/geany-plugins\?view=revision\&revision=|'"
>>>> HEAD
>>>> Works fine at least looking at quite a few of the commits in gitk
>>>> and has
>>>> the advantage of linking to the better ViewVC code browser that
>>>> SourceForge
>>>> offers.
>>> OK, thanks. So is there any "official" conclusion which format should
>>> be used? (I don't have any strong preference here.)
>> I'd personally prefer to have a valid SVN URL rather than a valid HTTP
>> link, but again, I don't mind much.
> Thanks for pointing out now *after* so much time and discussion that the
> existing URL *was a valid SVN URL*.  I'm glad I wasted my time :)
> </sarcasm>
> @Jiri
> I'd say it's your call, in light of this new information, I'd say leave
> it as is and get it done as soon as you have time (assuming no one else
> objects).

Sorry, I though you already knew it :/

However, Enrico agreed with setting up something appropriate on
geany.org, so if you think it's worth it, maybe it'd be possible to have
svn.geany.org/svnroot/geany-plugins at rev as a URL both valid for SVN and
a viewvc.  I totally agree that having the URL somewhere we control is
better, I'm just not completely sure it's worth the effort (but maybe
it's actually cheap, dunno).


More information about the Devel mailing list