[Geany-devel] Ideas on increasing quality of plugins

[Enrico Tröger]

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:27:24 +0100, Colomban wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:32:48 +1100, Lex wrote:
>>>>> We could maybe add a little wrapper script into the scripts/
>>>>> directory which sets a bunch of compiler options we like, for
>>>>> convenience.
>>>>
>>>> Having scripts like these is non-standard so it would have to be
>>>> *well* documented.  I still personally prefer in the build so long
>>>> as
>>>
>>> Ok. But if it's in the build system, it should be optionally and
>>> disabled by default, at least.
>>
>> Ok by me. (So long as how to enable it is obvious somewhere, unlike
>> most other configure options, I'm still not sure how to generate
>> plugins for non-standard prefixes using autofools :-)
>
>Why not, easy enough. However, I'm not completely sure the info in
>HACKING or whatever would be visible enough for every new (and current!
>) developer to see it, but we might start this way and see if it is OK.

I agree it might get forgotten in HACKING...


>Something like ./configure --enable-extra-c-warnings (or shorter if you
>prefer ^^)

...so this sounds good to me. Maybe that option could also display a
hint to check HACKING for more information about flags.


Regards,
Enrico

-- 
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110313/1c14d223/attachment.pgp>