[Geany-devel] Ideas on increasing quality of plugins

Frank Lanitz frank at xxxxx
Sat Mar 12 17:59:29 UTC 2011

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:09:29 +0100
Colomban Wendling <lists.ban at herbesfolles.org> wrote:

> > This issue is the same
> > for for all other validation tools (valgrind, etc). Actually such
> > maintains bother can be enough reason to abandon geany-plugins and
> > move plugins to somewhere else.
> It would probably be sad, and it's not the goal, but we try to find a
> way to improve plugin quality. And to achieve this, we need to have
> some criteria.
> Of course the goal is not to enforce a ton of coding standards,
> validation process and stuff, and if a particular developer have a
> complain about something we will discuss it without problem.
> But OTOH, if a plugin developer finds annoying to try to enforce a
> minimal quality on his plugin (the less crashers possible, not too
> many memory leaks, etc.), maybe geany-plguins don't want him. But I'm
> quite confident all developers want their code to be the better, so
> they would care :)

I second this :)
Maybe the user also don't want to have his/her plugin either :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110312/ce7f1562/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Devel mailing list