[Geany-devel] Bumping Geany's GTK minimum requirement to 2.12

Colomban Wendling lists.ban at xxxxx
Mon Jun 13 17:52:59 UTC 2011


Le 13/06/2011 19:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote:
> 
>> Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
>>> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany
>>>>>> to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I'd say let's go!
>>>
>>> I second this. 
>>
>> Okay, let's do then :)
>> However, I just realized that GTK 2.12 [1] depends on GLib 2.14, not
>> 2.16 [2] as you suggested so... do we depend on GLib 2.14 (as GTK 2.12)
>> or 2.16 (to get GIO in)?
> 
> I wanted GLib 2.16 because of GIO to get rid of #ifdefs.
> And based on Debian Lenny's GTK/Glib versions, I suggested the
> combination of GTK 2.12 and GLib 2.16 although they were not released
> in the same cycle.

Fine for me, just wanted to check what you meant exactly. An I agree
that having GIO in is one of the important thing to get rid of many #ifedfs.

> Btw, Nick is using GTK 2.12, so unless there is a super cool fancy
> feature in GTK 2.14 we cannot miss, I'd say 2.12 is ok for now.

No, I don't know of anything special that would make depending on 2.14
so much better. 2.12's fine.

I'll then do the bump soon.

Cheers,
Colomban



More information about the Devel mailing list