[Geany-devel] Improving usability and handling for Geany-Plugins

[Colomban Wendling]

Le 22/01/2011 11:54, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
>> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>>> >Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
>>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
>>> >> >> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the
>>> >> >>> combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of the
>>> >> >>> geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just cause
>>> >> >>> confusion, IMO.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by 0.20,
>>> >> >> and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
>>> >>
>>> >> 0.20.
>>> >> I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside is a
>>> >> good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this actually
>>> >> matches (geanylatex, geanyvc).
>>> >
>>> >Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
>>>
>>> Sorry for the wrong information. I just had a look at the geany-plugins
>>> repository and there is still the geanyvc directory. Maybe this could
>>> be removed?
>>
>> It is. Just check http://git.geany.org/geany-plugins/tree/
> 
> Then it seems the GIT mirror is broken.
> See http://geany-plugins.svn.sf.net/viewvc/geany-plugins/trunk, and for
> some reason,
> I think the SVN repo is more important than the GIT mirror :).
Seems that git-svn doesn't remove .svn directories, so the dirs
containing them doesn't get removed...