[Geany-devel] Improving usability and handling for Geany-Plugins

[Enrico Tröger]

 On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>> >Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
>> >> >> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the
>> >> >>> combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of 
>> the
>> >> >>> geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just 
>> cause
>> >> >>> confusion, IMO.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by 
>> 0.20,
>> >> >> and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
>> >>
>> >> 0.20.
>> >> I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside 
>> is a
>> >> good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this 
>> actually
>> >> matches (geanylatex, geanyvc).
>> >
>> >Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
>>
>> Sorry for the wrong information. I just had a look at the 
>> geany-plugins
>> repository and there is still the geanyvc directory. Maybe this 
>> could
>> be removed?
>
> It is. Just check http://git.geany.org/geany-plugins/tree/

 Then it seems the GIT mirror is broken.
 See http://geany-plugins.svn.sf.net/viewvc/geany-plugins/trunk, and for 
 some reason,
 I think the SVN repo is more important than the GIT mirror :).

 Regards,
 Enrico