[Geany-devel] Improving usability and handling for Geany-Plugins

Frank Lanitz frank at xxxxx
Sat Jan 22 08:48:26 UTC 2011


On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
> >Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
> >> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
> >> >> Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the
> >> >>> combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of the
> >> >>> geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just cause
> >> >>> confusion, IMO.
> >> >> 
> >> >> So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by 0.20,
> >> >> and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
> >> 
> >> 0.20.
> >> I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside is a
> >> good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this actually
> >> matches (geanylatex, geanyvc). 
> >
> >Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
> 
> Sorry for the wrong information. I just had a look at the geany-plugins
> repository and there is still the geanyvc directory. Maybe this could
> be removed?

It is. Just check http://git.geany.org/geany-plugins/tree/

Cheers, 
Frank
-- 
Frank Lanitz <frank at frank.uvena.de>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110122/837b1c50/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Devel mailing list