enrico.troeger at xxxxx
Tue Jan 18 19:34:14 UTC 2011
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:37:22 -0700, Jason wrote:
>Geany is missing some of the newer language features available to
>keywords, many of which are not just language features, but also
>objects, and their properties and methods. This just seems incorrect,
>to me. And I'll admit, the separation between embedded and standalone
Ok. So should we remove the extra keywords from filetypes.xml, to have
embedded JS containing only language features?
I don't mind much which way to go as I don't use JS and so don't really
know what's best.
>it's a "feature".
>I'll just attach a patch that contains all of the additions I've
>collected over a short (~20 minute) time frame. My primary source is
>Mozilla Documentation Network, although the ECMA standards are more
>authoritative. (Not that I even want to make an attempt to read it...)
>needs a thorough overlooking to determine what needs to go. I've
>stuck with keywords listed in  and  for what's really necessary
Awesome, thank you.
Committed (actually the second version of your patch).
>I tried to keep the separation between primary and secondary keywords
>simple: 'primary' keywords are statements, operators, types, values,
>and other language constructs. 'secondary' keywords are functions,
>objects, properties, methods, etc. Note that I have not included
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Devel